Fernando Garcia
Crunching -dimensional integrals down to 1 dimensional integrals
July 19th, 2024.
Introduction
Symmetry appears everything in physics. It is sometimes used to argue the construction of an object (say, constructing a spin 1/2 Lagrangian (density) through Lorentz invariance/symmetry), but other times we use it to break things down such as integrals.
If we have an integral over all -dimensions and the integrand depends only on the radial distance, then all of the angular integration follows almost trivially.
In this post we will find a formula to do this quickly. The first to note is that the angular integration gives none other than the surface area of a -dimensional unit sphere. We will show that this area is equal to
Where , again, is the number of dimensions, and is the Euler gamma function:
This blog post serves a similar purpose the last blog (number 10). The advantage of using Eq. (i) to break down a -dimensional integral is to get a 1-dimensional (radial) integral, which can be computed with less complications.
The surface of the unit -dimensional sphere
We will find the desired expression by performing the integral both in Cartesian and spherical coordinates.
We start by recalling that
So the Cartesian integral is:
For the spherical integral, we recall that
Where the integral goes from to . Further, . We see that the integral in spherical coordinates is:
Where denotes the area of the unit -dimensional sphere.
We now equate equations (ii) and (iii) to find:
As stated in the introduction.
How to use the formula
So far we only have the area of the unit -dimensional sphere, but what do we do with this? Consider an integral of the form:
Where only depends on the radial part. Then we turn the integrals into a single integral over the variable :
Where the integral over goes from to . It is often useful to make the trivial substitution or some other variable to avoid confusion with the 2 in the exponent acting just as a label rather than as an actual number.
Back to Blogs